Evaluation and Validation of Commercially Available Dopamine Transporter Antibodies

Abstract With a wide variety of dopamine transporter (DAT) antibodies available commercially, it is important to validate which antibodies provide sufficient immunodetection for reproducibility purpose and for accurate analysis of DAT levels and/or location. Commercially available DAT antibodies that are commonly used were tested in western blotting (WB) on wild-type (WT) and DAT-knock-out (DAT-KO) brain tissue and with immunohistology (IH) techniques against coronal slices of unilaterally lesioned 6-OHDA rats, in addition to wild-type and DAT-knock-out mice. DAT-KO mice and unilateral 6-OHDA lesions in rats were used as a negative control for DAT antibody specificity. Antibodies were tested at various concentrations and rated based on signal detection varying from no signal to optimal signal detection. Commonly used antibodies, including AB2231 and PT-22 524-1-AP, did not provide specific DAT signals in WB and IH. Although certain antibodies provided a good DAT signal, such as SC-32258, D6944, and MA5-24796, they also presented nonspecific bands in WB. Many DAT antibodies did not detect the DAT as advertised, and this characterization of DAT antibodies may provide a guide for immunodetection of DAT for molecular studies.


Introduction
Dopamine is a key neurotransmitter involved in the regulation of many functions including mood, voluntary movement, reward, sleep, and motivation (Torres, 2006;Schultz, 2007;Salamone and Correa, 2012). The dopamine transporter (DAT), a transmembrane protein found on presynaptic dopamine neurons, plays a crucial role in maintaining dopamine homeostasis through the reuptake of dopamine (Gainetdinov et al., 1998;Nelson, 1998;Gainetdinov and Caron, 2003;Torres et al., 2003b). Immunodetection of DAT is vital in dopamine-related research areas such as Parkinson's disease (PD), schizophrenia, substance use disorder, attention-deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), depression, and other neuropsychiatric conditions. However, it is sometimes difficult to generate antibodies for membrane proteins such as DAT because of their complex structures and highly conserved sequences among species, leading to low immunogenicity and antibody production (Hashimoto et al., 2018).
In an effort to catalog and validate available and commonly used commercial DAT antibodies, we assessed the ability, or lack thereof, of various commercial DAT antibodies to provide satisfactory immunodetection in western blotting (WB) and immunohistology (IH). These efforts are aimed to contribute to and strengthen scientific reproducibility, as immunodetection of DAT allows for analysis of DAT protein levels, its presence or absence, and assessment of its location (Miller et al., 1997;Wilson et al., 1996;Melikian and Buckley, 1999). In essence, proper and sufficient immunodetection of DAT can be one of the critical aspects for studies involving the dopamine system and validated antibodies would be helpful for these efforts.

Rats
RNU nude rats were purchased from Charles River and permitted two weeks to recover before surgery. Rats were housed individually with a 12/12 h light/dark cycle and provided food and water ad libitum. On the day of surgery, the weight of the rats was between 193 and 234 g, with a mean of 213.5 g. Procedures conformed to the recommendations of the Canadian Council on Animal Care and the National Institutes of Health guidelines for the care and use of animals, with all animal procedures performed in accordance with the University of Toronto animal care committee's regulations. In total, nine nude rats were used for the study (N = 4 males, N = 5 females).

Mice
For mouse experiments, wild-type (WT) and dopamine transporter knock-out (DAT-KO) mice (13-17 weeks old) with a C57BL/6J genetic background were used. Mice were housed on a 12/12 h light/dark cycle and food and water was provided ad libitum. Procedures conformed to the recommendations of the Canadian Council on Animal Care and the National Institutes of Health guidelines for the care and use of animals, with all animal procedures performed in accordance with the University of Toronto animal care committee's regulations. Experiments were conducted using C57 black background-matched WT and DAT-KO littermate mice (Giros et al., 1996;Vecchio et al., 2014). Antibodies were verified on three independent samples at three separate times. In total, 10 WT (N = 5 males, N = 5 females) and 10 DAT-KO (N = 5 males, N = 5 females) mice were used for the study.

6-OHDA microinjection surgery
Under the CCAC animal care recommendations for the reduction of animal use, we decided reuse control RNU nude rats from a prior study. In that study we unilaterally lesioned the dopamine neurons via a 6-OHDA injection in the medial forebrain bundle. Nude rats were required in this prior study because the experimental (but not control group) required human stem cell implantation. Surgeries and injections were conducted in sterile conditions in a biosafety cabinet. The control group of rats (no cell implant) received a 6-OHDA lesion in the medial forebrain using procedures described elsewhere (Kirik et al., 1998). In brief, rats were induced with anesthesia with 5% isoflurane and maintained with ;2% isoflurane while secured to a stereotaxic frame (Kopf Instruments, Model 963). The stereotaxic coordinates were calculated and adjusted for each animal for 6-OHDA injection (relative to bregma, AP = À3.9, ML = 1.2). At the correct coordinates, 0.8 mm holes were drilled in the skull overlying the right medial forebrain bundle. A 10 ml Hamilton syringe (Hamilton Company) was placed in the pump with a 2-inch, 33-G needle, with a 45°tip angle (Hamilton Company). Hamilton syringe pumps were loaded with newly thawed (within 1 min while covered) 6-OHDA (Sigma-Aldrich) solution which was prepared at 8 mg/ml in 0.9% sterile saline solution containing 0.02-0.04% of the antioxidant L-ascorbic acid. Hamilton syringe needles were directed to the medial forebrain bundle (from dura, DV = 7.7) and 6-OHDA was microinjected (20 mg, 2.5 ml volume, 0.5 ml/min). Five minutes following the completion of microinjection, the needle was raised by 0.25 mm. One minute later, the needle was slowly and completely retracted from the brain. The scalp was sutured with an absorbable suture. Animals were monitored continuously to ensure their health and wellbeing postsurgery. After 36 weeks, a total of nine rats were euthanized after 6-OHDA treatment and used for histologic studies.
Immunohistology LI-COR Immunohistology DAT and TH immunohistology (IH) protocol used was performed as described previously (Vecchio et al., 2014;Masoud et al., 2015). 6-OHDA rat brains were perfused via cardiac perfusion with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) then removed and stored in 4% PFA for 24 h followed by 10% sucrose for at least 48 h. Mouse WT and DAT-KO brains were removed after cervical dislocation and placed into 4% PFA for 24 h followed by 10% sucrose for at least 48 h (Vecchio et al., 2014). Briefly, IH was performed on coronal sections 40 mm thick, cut from the brains of adult WT and DAT-KO mice and 6-OHDA unilateral lesioned rats. Coronal brain slices were mounted on slides bordered with a hydrophobic pen (Gnomepen, Invignome) and quenched with 0.5% sodium borohydride in PBS. Sections were then blocked for 2 h at room temperature [10% normal goat serum (NGS)], 0.75% bovine serum albumin (BSA; 0.1% Triton X-100, in PBS). Blocking was followed by an overnight incubation at 4°C in solution containing anti-DAT antibody and blocking buffer (Table 2). Anti-TH staining (Table 2) was performed on rat slices to demonstrate the efficiency of the 6-OHDA lesion and as a positive control. Sections were then washed in chilled PBS and incubated with secondary antibodies (Table 2) for 1 h at room temperature and prepared for high resolution LI-COR imaging by coverslip mounting using Thermo Scientific Aqua-Mount Slide Mounting Media (Thermo Scientific, 143905). Slices were scanned at an offset of 0.9 mm. Method details for each antibody are specified in Table 2.

High-magnification immunohistology
The IH protocol for high-magnification immunohistology was adapted from methods described elsewhere (Vecchio et al., 2014). Coronal sections 40 mm thick were cut from the brains of adult WT and DAT-KO mice. Sections were placed in a 24-well plate and washed with 1.2% Triton X-100 in PBS. Sections were then blocked for one hour at room temperature [10% normal goat serum (NGS)]. Blocking was followed by an overnight incubation at 4°C in solution containing anti-DAT antibody and blocking buffer (Table 2). After antibody solutions were removed, sections were washed in 0.2% Tween 20 in PBS and incubated with secondary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature (Table 2). After an additional wash, slices were imaged after coverslip mounting with Vecta-Shield Mounting Liquid containing DAPI (VECTASHIELD, H-1200-10). Slices were scanned on a Revolve four Hybrid Fluorescence Microscope (ECHO, 76490-302) at 10Â, 20Â, and 40Â magnification.

Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was not included or required for the presentation of the following results as only representative data are shown. No quantitative analysis was completed on performed imaging studies. Figure 1. Western blots depicting anti-DAT antibodies with N-terminal immunogens. All western blots were performed using mouse striatum samples from DAT-knock-outs (DKO), and wild-type (WT) mice. Molecular ladder is indicated beside each figure, with detection of the dopamine transporter (DAT) indicated by a black arrow. Western blots include: (A) anti-DAT antibody MAB369 depicting no signal run on a Novex 4-20% Tris-Glycine gel using mouse striatum sample, (B) anti-DAT antibody AB2231 depicting strong nonspecific signal run on a Novex 4-20% Tris-Glycine gel using mouse striatum sample, (C) anti-DAT antibody SC-32258 depicting a moderate signal with some nonspecific bands run on a Novex 10% Tris-Glycine gel using mouse striatum sample, (D) anti-DAT antibody GTX30992 depicting a weak signal run on a homemade 10% Tris-Glycin acrylamide gel using mouse striatum sample, and (E) anti-DAT antibody ZRB1525 depicting a weak signal run on a Novex 10% Tris-Glycine gel using mouse striatum sample. Figure 2. Western blots depicting the remaining anti-DAT antibodies with N-terminal immunogens. All western blots were performed using mouse striatum samples from DAT-knock-outs (DKO), and wild-type (WT) mice. Total cell lysates were also obtained and utilized from HEK293 and DAT-expressing HEK293 cells. Molecular ladder is indicated beside each figure, with detection of the dopamine transporter (DAT) indicated by a black arrow. Western blots include: (A) anti-DAT antibody PT-22524-1-AP depicting a strong signal with nonspecific binding on a homemade 10% Tris-Glycin acrylamide gel using total cell lysate, (B) anti-DAT antibody PT-22524-1-AP depicting strong nonspecific signal on a homemade 10% Tris-Glycin acrylamide gel using a mouse striatum sample, (C) anti-DAT antibody D6944 depicting a strong DAT signal with some nonspecific binding on a homemade 10% Tris-Glycin acrylamide gel using mouse striatum sample, and (D) anti-DAT antibody MA5-24795 depicting a strong DAT signal with minor nonspecific binding on a Novex 10% Tris-Glycine gel using mouse striatum sample.

Results
Western blotting using antibodies against N-terminal epitopes of DAT Eight antibodies (MAB369, AB2231, SC-32 258, GTX30992, ZRB1525, PT-22524-1-AP, D6944, and MA5-24796) targeting the DAT N terminus were evaluated using western blotting. Under our conditions, antibody MAB369 showed no signal (Fig. 1A). Antibody AB2231 detects similar strong bands in WT and DAT-KO samples indicating that the detected bands are nonspecific and do not represent DAT (Fig. 1B). Antibody SC-32258 provided a moderate signal for DAT, did not display a DAT signal in the DKO sample, and showed the presence of some nonspecific bands (Fig. 1C). Antibody GTX30992 showed a weak signal for DAT that was not present in the DKO sample, with no nonspecific bands (Fig. 1D). Antibody ZRB1525 showed a weak signal for DAT that was not present in the DKO sample, and there were no nonspecific bands (Fig. 1E). Antibody PT-22524-1-AP showed good detection of DAT in HEK293 cells with the presence of some low-density nonspecific bands ( Fig. 2A). However, PT-22524-1-AP Good signal Signal is acceptable visualizing the appropriate protein band. Signal could still be optimized for improving the intensity and signal-to-noise ratio. 4 Optimal signal Perfect or close to perfect signal result visualizing the appropriate protein in cells and tissue samples with low signal noise. n/a n/a did not demonstrate adequate detection of DAT in animal tissue (Fig. 2B) and only detected nonspecific bands in WT and DKO samples. Antibody D6944 had strong detection of DAT that was not present in the DKO sample, with the presence of several strong nonspecific bands (Fig. 2C). Antibody MA5-24796 displayed a very good detection of DAT that was not present in the DKO sample with some low-density nonspecific bands (Fig. 2D). It is important to note that the Western blotting of antibody ZRB1525 and MA5-24796 were performed on striatal membrane preparations. This was done to further enrich the membrane fraction which contains DAT and as expected it resulted in cleaner and better detection with these antibodies. Western blotting results are scored (Table 3) and summarized in Table 4.
Western blotting using antibodies against C-terminal epitopes on DAT Three antibodies (431-DATC, 600-401-C75, and SC-1433) targeting the DAT C terminus were evaluated using Western blotting. Antibody 431-DATC gave a weak DAT signal that was not present in the DKO sample, with some nonspecific bands (Fig. 3A). Antibody 600-401-C75 provided no signal (Fig. 3B). Antibody SC-1433 provided a good signal for DAT that was not present in the DKO sample, with very weak nonspecific bands (Fig. 3C). Western blotting results are scored (Table 3) and summarized in Table 4.

Western blotting using antibodies against 2nd extracellular loop epitopes on DAT
Three antibodies (SC-32259, SC-58517, and 434-DATEL2) targeting the DAT 2nd extracellular loop were evaluated with western blotting. Antibody SC-32259 did not provide a DAT signal and produced some nonspecific bands (Fig. 4A). Antibody SC-58517 did not provide any signal (Fig. 4B). Antibody 434-DATEL2 did not provide a DAT signal and had several strong nonspecific bands (Fig. 4C). Western blotting results are scored (Table 3) and summarized in Table 4.  Open Source Tools and Methods Figure 5. Immunohistology (IH) using antibodies with anti-DAT antibodies that have N-terminal immunogens. IH was performed using wild-type (WT) mouse tissue, DAT-knock-out (DKO) mouse tissue, or rat tissue in which one hemisphere was lesioned with 6-OHDA to kill dopamine neurons, thus eliminating the possibility of a DAT antibody to produce a signal on the lesioned side (internal negative control). Concentration of DAT antibody is indicated in the figure. A, Anti-DAT antibody AB2231 displaying no signal in either mouse or rat tissue at a concentration of 1:100 or 1:200. B, Anti-DAT antibody MAB369 displaying moderate signal in mouse tissue and no signal in rat tissue at a concentration of 1:100 and 1:200. C, Anti-DAT antibody SC-32258 displaying good signal in Immunohistology using antibodies with DAT N-terminal immunogens Seven antibodies with immunogens for the DAT N terminus were tested using immunohistology (AB2231, MAB369, SC-32258, ZRB1525, PT-22524-1-AP, D6944, and MA5-24796). Antibody AB2231 showed no signal on the mouse tissue and had a very modest, barely detectable signal on the rat tissue at a concentration of 1:100 and 1:200 (Fig. 5A). Antibody MAB369 produced a moderate signal in WT mice but not in DKO mice at both concentrations of 1:100 and 1:200. MAB369 showed no signal in rat tissue (Fig. 5B). Antibody SC-32258 displayed a good signal in WT mouse tissue that was not present in DKO mouse tissue but produced no signal in rat tissue (Fig.  5C). Antibody ZRB1525 provided a good signal in WT mouse tissue that was not present in DKO mouse tissue at both 1:100 and 1:200 concentrations, and a good signal in rat tissue only at a concentration of 1:100 (Fig. 5D). Antibody PT-22524-1-AP showed a very weak signal in the WT mouse tissue and did not elicit a signal in the DKO mouse or rat tissue at both concentrations (Fig. 5E). Antibody D6944 produced a good signal in the WT mouse tissue but not the DKO mouse tissue at a concentration of 1:200 and did not produce a good signal in rat tissue (Fig.  5F). Antibody MA5-24796 elicited a good signal in WT mouse tissue and did not elicit a signal in DKO mouse tissue or rat tissue at concentrations of both 1:100 and 1:200 (Fig. 5G). Anti-TH antibody labeling in rat tissue was used as a control to demonstrate the 6-OHDA-lesioned side (Fig. 5H). Immunohistology results are scored (Table  3) and summarized in Table 4.

High-resolution immunohistology for select Nterminal antibodies
The three N-terminal antibodies (ZRB1525, D6944, and MA5-24796) were further evaluated in high-magnification immunohistology. Antibody ZRB1525 gave a good signal in WT but not DKO mice (Fig. 6A). Anybody, D6944, gave a good signal in WT but not DKO mice (Fig. 6B). Antibody MA5-24796, gave a good signal in WT, with some nonspecific signal in DKO mice because of the anti-mouse secondary antibody (Fig. 6C). Immunohistology results are scored (Table 3) and summarized in Table 4.

Immunohistology using antibodies with DAT Cterminal immunogens
One antibody (431-DATC) with an immunogen for the DAT C terminus was tested in immunohistology. The additional C-terminal antibodies, 600-401-C75 and SC-1433, are discontinued and unable to be purchased for experimentation and therefore were not further tested in histology. Antibody 431-DATC produced a very faint signal in WT mouse tissue that was not present in DKO mouse tissue and did not produce a signal in rat tissue (Fig. 7A). Anti-TH antibody labeling in rat tissue was used to demonstrate the 6-OHDA-lesioned side (Fig. 7B). Immunohistology results are scored (Table 3) and summarized in Table 4.

Immunohistology using antibodies with DAT 2nd loop immunogens
Two antibodies (SC-32259 and SC-58517) with immunogens for the DAT 2 nd loop were tested in immunohistology. Antibody SC-32259 provided a good signal in WT mouse tissue that was not detected in DKO mouse tissue, but only at a concentration of 1:100 and not at 1:200 (Fig.  8A). Antibody SC-32259 did not produce a DAT selective signal in rat tissue (Fig. 8A). Antibody SC-58517 produced a weak signal that was present in WT mouse tissue that was not present in DKO mouse tissue at both concentrations but did not produce a signal in rat tissue at either concentration (Fig. 8B). Anti-TH antibody labeling in rat tissue was used to demonstrate the 6-OHDA-lesioned side (Fig. 8C). Immunohistology results are scored (Table  3) and summarized in Table 4.

Discussion
The goal of this manuscript was to evaluate various DAT antibodies commonly used in the literature and report on their ability and selectivity/specificity in detecting DAT in western blotting and immunohistology. The capability of a DAT antibody to perform well is essential, as adequate detection of DAT is necessary for a large range of scientific endeavors involving the dopamine system. Additionally, it is crucial that the detection of DAT does not differ dramatically across similar testing conditions within or outside of a given laboratory. Such drastic variation across different batches of DAT antibody can lead to difficulty in interpretation of results. Although the antibody MAB369 has been considered the "gold standard" in DAT detection, the lot of MAB369 tested in our studies (Fig. 1) did not provide strong detection of DAT in Western blottings. It is important to note that other studies have reported strong signals using MAB369 (Loder and Melikian, 2003;Sorkina et al., 2003;Torres et al., 2003a;Miranda et al., 2007;Boudanova et al., 2008a, b;Eriksen et al., 2009;Vina-Vilaseca and Sorkin, 2010;Vecchio et al., 2014). With LI-COR as our primary detection method used, it is possible that an adequate signal was not detected using MAB369 because of a lack of signal amplification. Indeed, continued mouse tissue and no signal in rat tissue at a concentration of 1:100 and 1:200. D, Anti-DAT antibody ZRB1525 displaying a good signal in mouse tissue at a concentration of 1:100 and 1:200, and a poor signal in rat tissue at a concentration of 1:200. E, Anti-DAT antibody PT-22524-1-AP displaying weak signal in mouse tissue at concentrations of 1:100 and 1:200 and no signal in rat tissue at a concentration of 1:100 and 1:200. F, Anti-DAT antibody D6944 showing good signal in mouse tissue at a concentration of 1:200 and a weak signal in rat tissue. G, Anti-DAT antibody MA5-24796 showing good signal in mouse tissue and weak signal in rat tissue at concentrations of 1:100 and 1:200 H, Anti-TH antibody in rat tissue used to demonstrate good detection of the 6-OHDAlesioned side. Scale bar = 6 mm most studies that report a strong signal with MAB369 use chemiluminescence approaches which offers strong amplification. Since our approach does not have a similar amplification as chemiluminescence, it could explain the lack of signal with MAB369 (lot #3188610) using LI-COR. Interestingly however, previous lots of MAB369 (lot #2610475) tested by our group provided good detection with our LI-COR imaging system as well (Medvedev et al., 2013;Beerepoot et al., 2016), which could indicate some batch-to-batch inconsistencies for this antibody.
With regards to other antibodies tested, it was found that two of the commonly used antibodies in the literature do not detect specific/selective DAT bands. Our results show that antibody AB2231 gave no specific DAT signal in western blotting and had extensive nonspecific binding in mouse striatal samples (Fig. 1). Similarly, antibody PT-22524-1-AP had no specific DAT signal in western blotting from brain tissue and gave a very weak and nonspecific signal in immunohistology (Figs. 2, 5). These two antibodies have been quite extensively used in the literature (Cone et al., 2013;McIntosh et al., 2013;Ruocco et al., 2014;Sconce et al., 2015;Hood et al., 2016;Calipari et al., 2017;Churchill et al., 2017;Y. Zhang et al., 2017;Alonso et al., 2021). Antibody AB2231 and PT-22524-1-AP use immunogens to the N-terminal regions of the rat dopamine transporter and human dopamine transporter, respectively. The specific sequences of their immunogens are not accessible. Although, in principle, these antibodies should produce a specific signal when binding to rat and mouse DAT in immunohistology and mouse DAT during western blotting, no specific signal was detected with these antibodies either in western blotting nor immunohistology assay. The mouse and rat DAT sequences are highly conserved; therefore, it is unlikely that lack of signal is because of species-specific detection issues. Furthermore, blocking procedures were performed with instrument specific (LI-COR) blocking buffer to prevent nonspecific binding, and primary antibody concentrations were prepared as per manufacturer recommendations for WB (Tables 2, 4). The simplest explanation might be that these antibodies are not adequate for detecting DAT.
Our western blotting and immunohistology results for PT-22524-1-AP antibody did not detect any specific DAT signal from animal tissue despite being performed as per manufacturer guidelines (Table 2). PT-22524-1-AP antibody immunogen sequence is based on an N-terminal region of the human dopamine transporter. The first 60 aa in the human DAT are more conserved in the mouse Figure 6. High-magnification immunohistology using antibodies with N-terminal immunogens. Immunohistology was performed using wild-type (WT) mouse tissue and DAT-knock-out (DKO) mouse tissue. All DAT antibody concentrations were performed continued at 1:200. DAPI signal is indicated in blue. A, Anti-DAT antibody ZRB1525 (red) at magnifications of 10Â, 20Â, and 40Â. Clear DAT signal differentiation is seen between WT and DKO with no nonspecific signal (no red signal). B, anti-DAT antibody D6944 stained (red) at magnifications of 10Â, 20Â, and 40Â. Clear DAT signal differentiation is seen WT with no signal in DKO. C, Anti-DAT antibody MA5-24796 (green). Clear DAT signal differentiation is seen between WT and DKO with some nonspecific signal seen in DKO at 40Â magnification. Scale bars are indicated in the bottom-left corner of each figure (white). compared with the rat sequence (six variations in amino acid sequence compared with eight variations, respectively). This could potentially explain the weak signal detected in immunohistology of mouse tissue and no signal detected in the rat (Table 4). Interestingly, PT-22524-1-AP antibody did have good detection of human DAT protein expressed in HEK cells ( Fig. 2A). Antibody ZRB1525's immunogen also consists of an unspecified 18 amino acid portion of the human DAT N terminus. Interestingly, ZRB1525 produced a good signal in both mouse and rat brains in immunohistology, and a weak to moderate signal in western blotting from mouse tissue (Table 4). It can be speculated that the immunogen for ZRB1525 is in a region of the N terminus that is more similar among rats and mice compared with PT-22524-1-AP, resulting in better signal detection in mice and rats. Three antibodies (D6944, MA5-24 796, ZRB1525) were further evaluated in high-magnification immunohistology. These antibodies were chosen because they gave good signal detection in LI-COR immunohistology (Fig. 5D,F,G). By comparing WT Figure 7. Immunohistology (IH) using an antibody with a DAT C-terminal immunogens. IH was performed using wild-type (WT) mouse tissue, DAT-knock-out (DKO) mouse tissue, or rat tissue in which one hemisphere was lesioned with 6-OHDA to kill dopamine neurons, thus eliminating the possibility of a DAT antibody to produce a signal on the lesioned side (internal negative control). Concentration of DAT antibody indicated in the figure. A, Anti-DAT antibody 431-DATC displaying a faint signal in WT mouse tissue at a concentration of 1:100 and 1:200 and no signal in rat tissue at either concentration. B, Anti-TH antibody in rat tissue used to demonstrate good detection of the 6-OHDA-lesioned side. Scale bar = 6 mm Figure 8. Immunohistology (IH) using antibodies with anti-DAT antibodies that have 2nd extracellular loop immunogens. IH was performed using wild-type (WT) mouse tissue, DAT-knock-out (DKO) mouse tissue, or rat tissue in which one hemisphere was lesioned with 6-OHDA to kill dopamine neurons, thus eliminating the possibility of a DAT antibody to produce a signal on the lesioned side (internal negative control). Concentration of DAT antibody indicated in the figure. A, Anti-DAT antibody SC-32259 showing good signal in mouse tissue at a concentration of 1:100 but no signal in mouse or rat tissue at a concentration of 1:200. B, Anti-DAT antibody SC-58517 with weak signal in mouse tissue at a concentration of 1:100 and 1:200 and no signal in rat tissue at 1:100 and 1:200. C, Anti-TH antibody in rat tissue used to demonstrate good detection of the 6-OHDA-lesioned side. Scale bar = 6 mm and DKO samples stained for these antibodies, there is a clear strong signal in WT animals and a clear absence of signal in DKO slices, indicating that they also work very well at high magnification (Fig. 6). There was however some nonspecific binding seen at high magnifications with MA5-24796. We hypothesize that this is due the secondary anti-mouse antibody. Indeed, anti-mouse staining without any primary antibody showed green signal that was similar to background signal seen in DKO animals (data not shown), suggesting that the nonspecific signal in Figure 6C can be attributed to the specificity of the secondary antibody, and not the primary antibody.
In summary, not all commercially available DAT antibodies detect DAT as advertised, and using such antibodies should be carefully considered in terms of application, specifics of protocol, and if the antibody has been tested against a proper negative control, such as a DAT-KO sample, to ensure selectivity and specificity.